Legal Opinion
3m Innovative Properties Company and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Avery Dennison Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 20, 2004No. 03-1203Published
1Opinion of the Court
350 F.3d 1365
3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 03-1203.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Decided: December 2, 2003.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 20, 2004.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Frank P. Porcelli, Fish & Richardson, P.C., of Boston Massachusetts, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Frank E. Scherkenbach, Robert E. Hillman, Gregory A. Madera, and Kurt L. Glitzenstein; and John C. Adkisson, Fish & Richardson, P.C.,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Ccs Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation and Its Division Life FitnessCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Scimed Life Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc. v. Zebco Corporation and Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.