Lamonts Apparel, Inc. v. SI-Lloyd Associates
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in this case concerning the parties’ rights under a commercial lease. The court thereafter granted defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and plaintiff appeals. We are unable to decide the merits of the appeal at this time, because we do not know whether defendant filed the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict within 10 days after the entry of judgment, as ORCP 63 D requires. On its face, the motion was untimely, but the trial court granted defendant’s motion under ORCP 71A to show that defendant filed the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. BarkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Kidney Association of Oregon v. FergusonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JordanOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Salt Lake City v. United Park City Mines CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pinnell v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Dept. of Human Services v. J. E. D. V.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- In re Marriage of Schwartz and BattiniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. McReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Lamonts Apparel, Inc. v. SI-Lloyd AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.