Legal Opinion

Lamonts Apparel, Inc. v. SI-Lloyd Associates

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 4, 1998No. 9411-07588; CA A91907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

This case involves a dispute arising from plaintiffs attempts to assign or sublet retail space that it leased from defendant in the Lloyd Center in Portland. The jury found that defendant breached the lease by unreasonably refusing to consent to plaintiffs proposed arrangements and awarded plaintiff damages. The court thereafter granted defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the ground that the proposed arrangements did not substantially comply with the existing lease and, thus, defendant had no obligation to be reasonable in deciding whether to accept them. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Abbott v. BOB'S U-DRIVEOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Chiles v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. Chiles v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Jaber v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  5. Neal v. Craig Brown, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anthony Gagliano & Co., Inc. v. Openfirst, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Anthony Gagliano & Co., Inc. v. Openfirst, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API