Legal Opinion

State v. Barker

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1988No. 87-095PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.

Although the information charged Arthur H. Barker with murder in the second degree, see Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-304 (Reissue 1985), the jury found Barker guilty of the *843lesser-included offense of manslaughter, see Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-305 (Reissue 1985), concerning the death of Patricia A. Pappas. As his sole assignment of error, Barker contends that the sentencing judge should have recused himself, as requested by Barker, on account of the judge’s ex parte contact with members of the victim’s family. Barker’s contention presents a question of first impression in Nebraska. We set aside the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. United States v. HeldtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  4. Billy Joe Tyler v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden, Missouri State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  5. Price Brothers Company, Cross-Appellant v. Philadelphia Gear Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. RyanNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. GalindoNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State Ex Rel. Grape v. ZachNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API