In re Marriage of Schwartz and Battini
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, P. J.
*871Father appeals a supplemental judgment modifying his parenting time and awarding mother attorney fees. Father argues that the trial court erred in three ways: first, in denying his motion to continue the modification trial; second, in hearing mother's motion after having previously recused itself; and, third, in modifying father's parenting time in the manner that it did. Father further contends that, if we ultimately reverse the judgment at issue, we must also reverse the trial court's associated attorney fee award. Writing only to address father's second assignment of error, we conclude…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchenckOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of Marriage of ColtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Gothard v. DemskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Savoy v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025