Hunter v. Hines
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Kiowa County; I. R. Tolbert, Judge. Action between A. J. Hunter and Ula M. Hines and others. From the judgment, Hunter brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Counsel for defendants in error insists that this proceeding in error should be dismissed (1) for the reason that the record does not disclose that a motion for a new trial was filed or passed upon, and (2) that the petition in error does not allege the overruling of a motion for a new trial as ground for a review and reversal of the judgment.
The motion is well taken as to both grounds. Deering v. Meyers, 29 Okla. 232, 116 Pac. 793; Burrus v. Funk, 29 Okla. 677, 119 Pac. 976; Cox v. Lavine, 29 Okla. 312, 116 Pac. 920; McDonald et al. v. Wilson, 29 Okla. 309, 116 Pac. 920; Meyer v. James, 29…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Meyer v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Cox v. LavineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- McDonald v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Burrus v. FunkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Deering v. MeyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jennings Co. v. DyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Tulsa Fuel & Mfg. Co. v. McCartySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915