Legal Opinion
McDonald v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 11, 1911No. 901PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error from District Court, Wagoner County; I. H. King, Judge. Action between Hugh McDonald and others and Charles Wilson. From the judgment, McDonald and others bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Plaintiffs in error in their petition in error make the following assignments of error, to wit:
“(1) That the findings of fact and judgment in partition are not sustained by sufficient evidence. (2) That the findings of fact and judgment in partition are contrary to law. (3) That the court erred in finding that John Perryman and Randolph Perryman were legal heirs at law of Lizzie Harvey, deceased, and as such entitled to inherit of her land.”
The finding made by the court is as follows:
“(1) That this suit was filed in this court on the 11th day of December, 1907, by plaintiff, in which he asks…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin v. GassertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Whiteacre v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Meyer v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Kimbriel v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Cox v. LavineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3Cited by8 opinions
- Turner v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Butler v. Oklahoma State Bank of DurantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Bice v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- George v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Hunter v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.