Cox v. Lavine
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Washington County Court; H. H. Montgomery, Special Judge. Action by Charles Lavine against J. D. Cox. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The plaintiff in error in his petition in error alleges error in the following respects: (1) Verdict not sustained by sufficient evidence and contrary to law. (3) In overruling demurrer by plaintiff in error to the evidence. (3) In giving instruction No. 3. (4) In refusing to give certain instructions. (5) In overruling motion of plaintiff in error to exclude certain evidence, on the ground that no cause of action has been stated. (6-S) In admitting certain evidence. (9) In excluding the answers of certain witnesses. (10) In admitting certain depositions.
Neither in the petition in error, nor…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martin v. GassertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Whiteacre v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Meyer v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Kimbriel v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jennings Co. v. DyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Turner v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- McDonald v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Butler v. Oklahoma State Bank of DurantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Bice v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.