Legal Opinion

Birmingham Electric Co. v. Hereford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 5, 1933No. 6 Div. 411PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The opinion of the Court of Appeals is to be construed as containing, without a discussion of the proof, the conclusion of that court from the facts in the record that the newly discovered evidence meets all the requirements of our decisions. So considered, there is nothing in the opinion that may be properly interpreted as running counter to the rule of our decisions, which prohibits a party from speculating upon the result of a trial and then become surprised at the result. Mutual B. & L. Ass’n v. Watson, 226 Ala. 526, 147 So. 817; Aldridge v. Tully Plumbing & Heating Co., 216 Ala. 567, 114…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. MinderhoutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Kirkwood v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Folmar v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Ex parte ShoafSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. Co. v. SinquefieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Birmingham Gas Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. New York Life Ins. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API