Legal Opinion

Cable-Burton Piano Co. v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 25, 1934No. 5 Div. 171PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSTER, Justice.

It is urged that the bill of exceptions does not show that the exception to a portion of the oral charge -which the Court of Appeals held to be erroneous was reserved before the jury retired. That opinion recites that the record shows that at the conclusion of the court’s oral charge counsel gave notice of the exception.

This court held in Central of Georgia R. Co. v. Courson, 186 Ala. 155, 65 So. 179, 180, that it would construe a bill of exceptions to mean that written charges .were requested before the jury retired, when the bill of exceptions recited that “the foregoing was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Birmingham Southern R. Co. v. GoodwynSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  2. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Robinson v. SteversonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Donahoo v. TarrantAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Wade v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Birmingham Gas Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. Fortenberry v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Insurance Company of North America v. SouthernCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API