Legal Opinion
Randall v. Tradewell Stores, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 16, 1944No. 29164PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for alleged breach of contract. In August, 1939, plaintiffs, Randall and Doyle, purchased from defendant, Trade-well Stores, Inc., three retail groceries, two of which were located in Yakima, the third in Toppenish. The contract of sale contained the following provision:
“(5) It is understood that the Seller is on the direct buying list and agrees to buy direct for the Purchaser merchandise from time to time as requisitioned by the Purchaser, the Purchaser agreeing to accompany each requisition with a check in sufficient amount to pay the cost of such…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- J. W. Seavey Hop Corp. v. PollockWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Belch v. Big Store Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
- Gaffney v. O'LearyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Robbins v. Seattle Peerless Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
- Seeley v. PeabodyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lanegan v. CraufordWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Ackerley Media Group, Inc. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Lopez v. ReynosoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Zarbell v. MantasWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Allen v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.