Legal Opinion

Gaffney v. O'Leary

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1929No. 22024. Department TwoPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover the possession of an automobile. "When the action was instituted, the plaintiff, by writ of replevin, took the automobile from the possession of the defendants. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment directing that the automobile be returned to the defendants and awarding them damages for its use during the time that they had been deprived of the possession. From this judgment, the plaintiffs appeal.

The case will be treated as though Phillip Gaffney were the only appellant and C. W. O’Leary the only respondent.

The facts,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blackford v. NeavesArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Butts v. . ScrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. Hammett v. . LinnemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. Holt & JefferyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. MacKenzie v. SteevesWashington Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Buyken v. ErtnerWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Becker v. Lagerquist Bros., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hoff v. LesterWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Beatty v. Western Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Ikovich v. Silver Bow Motor Car Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API