Legal Opinion
Shimmon v. Moore
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 4, 1951No. Civ. 14549PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AGEE, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal by defendants, doing business as Moore and Roberts, from a judgment of $1,964 entered against them following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff in that amount.
Appellants, as general contractors, entered into a subcontract with respondent whereunder respondent was to do the plastering work on a theater building being constructed at Menlo Park.
Appellants had also become the general contractors for the construction of the mess hall at the Veterans’ Home at Yountville. Respondent was the low bidder on the plastering work on this job, and on January 3, 1946,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Lindsay v. MacKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Singh v. CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- White v. ArdzrooniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Zancanaro v. CrossArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Geffen v. MossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Petersen v. Cloverdale Egg FarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- J. C. Millett Co., a Corporation Doing Business as Key Distributing Co. v. Distillers Distributing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.