Legal Opinion

Kinloch Tel. Co. v. Western Electric Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 17, 1902No. 1,637PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The circuit court rendered a decree in favor of the Western Electric Company, the complainant in that court, to the effect that the defendants, the Kinloch Telephone Company and Samuel M. Kennard, had infringed the first three claims of letters patent No. 330,067 issued to John A. Seely on November 10, 1885, for an “improvement in grouping spring jacks and annunciators for multiple switchboards,” and perpetually enjoined them from using the invention described in those claims. The defendants have appealed from this decree, and they insist that it is erroneous, on the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. New York Scaffolding Co. v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  2. Stearns-Roger Mfg. Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  3. Manhattan Life Ins. v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  4. National Malleable Castings Co. v. Buckeye, Malleable Iron & Coupler Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  5. St. Louis Street Flushing Mach. Co. v. American Street Flushing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API