Legal Opinion

St. Louis Street Flushing Mach. Co. v. American Street Flushing Mach. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 22, 1907No. 2,507PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit to enjoin infringement of United States letters patent No. 795,059, granted July 18, 1905, to complainant, the American Street Flushing Machine Company, as as-signee of L. F. Oftofy, the inventor. The decree below was for complainant, and defendants appeal.

The object of the invention, as stated in the specification, “is to devise a street flushing' cart in which the discharge of the water is easily and accurately controlled by the driver, in which the delivery of the water shall be such as to secure the maximum washing; effect without excessive use of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Cantrell v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Detroit Motor Appliance Co. v. BurkeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1925
  2. National Tube Co. v. AikenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  3. Stebler v. Riverside Heights Orange Growers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  4. Johnson Automobile Lock Co. v. Noser Instant Auto Lock Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  5. Galvin Electric Mfg. Co. v. Emerson Electric Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API