Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Weise Apartments—44457 Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 11, 2000No. 98 Civ. 1565 RLCPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARTER, District Judge.
Defendants, Weise Apartments — 44457 Corporation (“Weise Corp.”), Pearl Ventures, Limited (“Pearl Corp.”), and Martin Weise (“Weise”) move pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4), F.R. Civ. P., to vacate the June 30, 1998 default judgment entered against Weise Corp. and Pearl Corp. (“default judgment”) in favor of plaintiff, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), on the ground that the FDIC’s filing of an amended complaint, pursuant to Rule 15(a), F.R. Civ. P., rendered the default judgment void. Defendant Weise also contends that the filing of the amended…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Trading Corporation of India, Ltd. v. Assuranceforeningen SkuldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Paganis v. BlonsteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Elnora Camp, as Administrator of the Estate of Anthony Young, Deceased v. George GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Markert v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Joan Evans Wilburn v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Faryniarz v. RamirezDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Johannes Baumgartner Wirtschafts-Und Vermögensberatung v. SalzmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- ENCARNACION EX REL. GEORGE v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Duane Reade, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Fairfield Sentry Limited ( In Liquidation) v. Fortis Global Custody Services N.V. n/k/a ABN AMROUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.