Legal Opinion

Maria Cardwell Tomlin, and Christine Williams Harrell v. The Boeing Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 13, 1981No. 79-4369PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:

The laws of four states and the Republic of South Vietnam are potentially involved in this case. The issue is whether the appellants’ wrongful death action against the Boeing Company is time-barred. The answer turns on which statute of limitations governs. The/ district court, interpreting Washington conflicts law, concluded that a Washington court would not apply Washington’s three year statute of limitation and dismissed the case as time-barred under the other states’ shorter limitation periods. We conclude that a recent decision of the Washington Supreme Court…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mudpie, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Rice v. Dow Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Jones v. R. S. Jones & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1993
  4. Bates v. Cook, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
  5. Alexia Herrera v. Zumiez, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API