Helmac Products Corp. v. Roth (Plastics) Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEWBLATT, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment as to Count V of the supplemental complaint. This count seeks the Court to use its inherent power to sanction Eric Roth for ordering the destruction of documents that were subject to discovery in litigation between Helmac, Inc. (“Helmac”) and Roth (plastics) Corp. (“Roth (plastics)”), a Canadian company, under the Anti-Dumping Act of 1916, 15 U.S.C. § 71 et seq. (“the Act”).
This Court previously conducted an evidentiary hearing that lasted several weeks regarding the document…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Helmac Products Corp. v. Roth (Plastics) Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
- Helmac Products Corp. v. Roth (Plastics) Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
3Cited by18 opinions
- Marshak v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Desiderio v. Parikh (In re Parikh)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Cree, Inc. v. BHP Energy Mex. S. De R.L. De C.V.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2018
- Books Are Fun, Ltd. v. RosebroughDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007
- Bray & Gillespie Management LLC v. Lexington InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.