Funding Systems Leasing Corporation v. Diaz
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action for unpaid rent on a lease of electronic equipment. The defendants have appeared specially and pleaded in abatement that the parties to the lease stipulated in paragraph twenty-two therein that any action or proceeding arising under the lease would be litigated only in courts located in New York state. The plaintiff has demurred to the plea on the grounds that the stipulation seeks to oust this court of jurisdiction and is against public policy and unenforceable.
Paragraph twenty-two of the lease annexed to the complaint reads as follows:
"STIPULATION THAT AGREEMENT IS A LEASE…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Central Contracting Co. v. C. E. Youngdahl & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Wm. H. Muller & Co., Inc. v. Swedish American Line Ltd. And Transatlantic Steamship Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Krenger v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Parker, Peebles & Knox v. El SaiehSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Johnson Acoustics, Inc. v. P. J. Carlin Construction Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Manrique v. FabbriSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Professional Ins. Corp. v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- High Life Sales Co. v. Brown-Forman Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Perkins v. CCH Computax, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Zurich Ins. Co. v. AllenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.