Parker, Peebles & Knox v. El Saieh
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The scope of the inquiry required by defendant’s assignments of error depends to a considerable extent upon the status of and the effect properly to be accorded to the “disclosure” filed by the garnishee. The trial court in denying the plaintiff’s motions to strike it out and to expunge ruled that while it “is not to be considered, for the present at least, a pleading, and its allegations have not been admitted” (by the demurrer to the plea to the jurisdiction), it “performs a certain office, and may be of service to the court,” and “is not out of place in the file.” It is apparent from the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Home Ins. Co. v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Coyne v. PlumeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Nashua River Paper Co. v. Hammermill Paper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Emerson v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1833
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Samson v. BerginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Reiner, Reiner & Bendett, P.C. v. Cadle Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Fitzsimmons v. International Assn. of MacHinistsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Chambers v. Blickle Ford Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.