Legal Opinion

Abbott Laboratories v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 6, 2009No. B204210PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KITCHING, J.

INTRODUCTION

This appeal concerns the effect of Farmer Bros. Co. v. Franchise Tax Bd. (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 976 [134 Cal.Rptr.2d 390] (Farmer Bros.) on Revenue and Taxation Code section 24402. Farmer Bros, held that section 24402 violated the commerce clause of the United States Constitution by allowing a tax deduction to a corporation which received a dividend declared from income of a corporation subject to California tax, while not allowing a tax deduction to a corporation receiving a dividend declared from income of a corporation not subject to California tax.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Santa Barbara School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People's Advocate, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Diva Limousine, Ltd. v. Uber Techs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  2. River Garden Retirement Home v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Borikas v. Alameda Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Southern California Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Apple, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API