Legal Opinion
Crum & Forster, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided October 18, 1994No. 06-92-00100-CVPublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Justice.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Trial Results
Crum & Forster, Inc.,- International Insurance Company, United States Fire Insurance Company, North River Insurance Company, and Commonwealth Lloyd’s Insurance Company (the appellants), appeal from a judgment favoring Monsanto Company (Monsanto), awarding Monsanto actual and treble damages, prejudgment interest, and attor neys’ fees in the total amount of $71,048,-070.22, as well as costs and post-judgment interest. Monsanto sued the appellant insurance companies alleging that they had wrongfully obtained and manipulated a financial…
2Cases cited134 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Lesikar v. Rappeport, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
- Beasley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Gunn Infiniti, Inc. v. O'BYRNETexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Holden v. Weidenfeller, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.