Legal Opinion

Dairyland County Mutual Insurance Co. of Texas v. Roman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1973No. B-3701PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Justice.

This is a suit to recover under the uninsured motorist provisions of an automobile liability insurance policy. On the controlling questions presented for decision, we hold: (1) that a minor insured is not necessarily excused from complying with the notice requirements of the policy throughout the time he is under the disability of minority; (2) that where the plaintiff avers generally that all conditions precedent have been performed and no attempt is made to raise an issue of notice except by a sham pleading, the defendant is not entitled to a reversal on the ground that the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Klein v. Century LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Members Mutual Insurance Company v. CutaiaTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Sherman v. Provident American Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HamblenTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Wells v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Roy Seger v. Yorkshire Insurance Co., Ltd., and Ocean Marine Insurance Co., Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. YoulerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. John T. Stephens v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. St. Paul Surplus Lines Ins. Co., Inc. v. Dal-Worth Tank, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
  5. Champion v. Panel Era Mfg. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API