Legal Opinion

Gunn v. Haworth

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1902No. 19,790PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From Hamilton Circuit Court; J. F. Neal, Judge. Proceeding by Cassius Haworth and others for the construction of a free gravel road. From a judgment for the petitioners, Henry H. Gunn and others, remonstrators, appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

— Appellees filed before the board of commissioners of Hamilton county their petition for the construction of a free gravel road under'the act approved April 8, 1885 (Acts 1885, p. 162), and such proceedings were had thereunder that appellants and one Mary Likens seasonably filed their joint remonstrance against the viewers’ report for the causes, “(1) That the viewers’ report is not according to law; and (2) the land of each remonstrator is not benefited.” The remonstrance'was determined adversely to all of the remonstrators, and they all joined in an appeal to the circuit court. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. StanglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Gourley v. EmbreeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Burke v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Garside v. WolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Snyder v. State ex rel. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ward v. YarnelleIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Keiser v. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Town of Windfall City v. State ex rel. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Allmon v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Jenkins v. SteeleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API