Legal Opinion
Trizna v. New York, C. & St. L. R.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 17, 1944PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
The defendant moves for an order vacating the service of process and dismissing the action for lack of venue on the ground that defendant is not doing business in this district and on the further ground that to maintain this action in the district would constitute an unreasonable burden upon interstate commerce.
The action is brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 51-60. Plaintiff is a citizen and resident of Ohio. The injuries complained of were sustained in Ohio. Defendant is a consolidated railroad corporation and its articles of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Miles v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Frene v. Louisville Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kilpatrick v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Abrams v. Bendix Home Appliances, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Pickthall v. Anaconda Copper Min. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Kilpatrick v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Fraley v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.