Legal Opinion
Kilpatrick v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 16, 1947No. Civ. 39-341, 39-349PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFEY, District Judge.
The matter now comes up on the motions by defendant to dismiss these two actions and the motions by plaintiffs to take depositions, which were not disposed of hy my previous opinion. D.C., 72 F.Supp. 632. Defendant has submitted the affidavits and briefs which I then directed should be submitted. Defendant has also filed a formal notice of the withdrawal of that branch of its motions based upon service of process upon an allegedly improper person. Plaintiffs have submitted no new affidavits on briefs, relying upon the affidavits and briefs submitted upon the original…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Hutchinson v. Chase & Gilbert, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Toledo Railways & Light Co. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Cheng v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Kilpatrick v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Brown & Bigelow, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Smith v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.