Legal Opinion
Gontarz v. Town of Berlin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 7, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
These three cases all arise out of proceedings undertaken by the defendant the planning commission of the town of Berlin, pursuant to § 8-29 of the General Statutes, to widen a highway in the town of Berlin. A strip of land was taken along the front of each of the three properties involved, and in each instance the commission determined that no damages should be assessed to the owners as a result of the taking. The owners of each of the properties appealed to the Court of Common Pleas for a reassessment of damages pursuant to the provisions of § 8-30. The three cases were tried together, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morgan v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Andrews v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Northeastern Gas Transmission Co. v. Tersana Acres, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Eljay Realty Co. v. ArgravesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Tyler v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Laurel, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Commissioner of Transportation v. LarobinaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- City of Meriden v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Commissioner of Trans., Conn. v. Smith, No. Cv00-015 70 89 S (Jan. 22, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Commissioner, Trans. v. Leonard-Leonore, No. Cv01-008 53 54 S (Jan. 7, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003