Legal Opinion
City of Meriden v. Ives
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 23, 1974PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
Pursuant to a stipulation, these two eases arising out of the partial condemnation of two public parks maintained by the city of Meriden were briefed and argued together. They are appeals from the action of the Hon. Patrick B. O’Sullivan, a state referee, who, exercising the powers of the Superior Court, rendered a deficiency judgment for the city in each case but refused to award severance damages. The main issue presented by the assignment of errors is whether the referee erred in refusing to consider the existence of severance damages to the remaining parcels of parkland.
In June, 1968, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Town of Winchester v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- In Re Widening of Bagley AvenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Slavitt v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alemany v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Laurel, Inc. v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Lynch v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Duksa v. City of MiddletownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- City of Meriden v. Highway CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.