Legal Opinion

State Workmen's Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1996PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELLEGRINI, Judge.

Loehbaum Rehabilitation Services and The State Workmen’s Insurance Fund (collectively, Employer) appeal from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting Kelli Wagner’s (Claimant) claim petition.

Claimant began working for Employer in 1989 as a part-time physical therapy assistant. Claimant eventually worked five days a week, although only working half days on Tuesdays and Thursdays. As a physical therapy assistant, Claimant was required to perform ultrasound treatments, hot-pack therapy and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Fotta v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Kelly v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gentex Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. AT&T v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Noverati v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Body Shop v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Rite Aid Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API