Legal Opinion
AT&T v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 17, 1998PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Judge.
AT&T (Employer) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) which affirmed the decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) denying Employer’s petition for termination and granting Ruben Hernandez’ (Claimant) petition to review compensation benefits.
On April 8, 1989, while working for Employer as a building attendant, Claimant sustained a work-related injury when a large cabinet filled with computers fell on to his left hip, causing his right hip to strike the floor and trapping Claimant between the cabinet and the floor. (WCJ’s Findings of Fact,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Greenwich Collieries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Campbell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Cardyn v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- State Workmen's Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jeanes Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Westinghouse Electric Corp./CBS v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Jeanes Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Westinghouse Electric Corp./CBS v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.