Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Williams v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1984No. 83-507PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This court has consistently held that the commission’s factual findings, when supported by the record, will not be disturbed. State, ex rel. Allerton, v. Indus. Comm. (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 396, 397 [23 O.O.3d 358]; State, ex rel. G F Business Equip., Inc., v. Indus. Comm. (1981), 66 Ohio St. 2d 446, 447 [20 O.O.3d 379]. Appellant argues that the record does not support the commission’s findings.

In its order, the commission cited the reports of Drs. Brown, Hutchison, Rapier, and Kackley. Dr. Brown opined that appellant was twenty-five percent permanently impaired. His opinion with regard to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. G F Business Equipment, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Meeks v. Ohio Brass Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Indus.Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Garrett v. Jeep Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State ex rel. US Tubular Prods., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State ex rel. Turner v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API