Legal Opinion

Holt v. City of Maumelle

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 2, 1990No. 89-254PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis H. Turner, Justice.

This appeal is brought by the plaintiff class from a decision of the Pulaski County Chancery Court granting the appellees’ motion to dismiss and upholding an initiated ordinance approved by a majority of the voters of the City of Maumelle. The ordinance provides for a “service charge for police and fire protection and street lighting.”

The ordinance provides for a monthly charge of fourteen dollars for “houses and other similar dwelling structures”; twelve dollars per month for “condominiums and apartments”; and variable charges for commercial establishments and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Henderson v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Hice v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Hot Springs School District No. 6 v. WellsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Dicks v. NaffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Graham v. Forrest City Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Roy v. Farmers & Merchants InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Jarboe v. Shelter InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Death & Permanent Total Disability Trust Fund v. Hempstead CountyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Death & Permanent Total Disability Fund v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API