Hice v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
The appellant, 20, was convicted of the rape of a 9-year-old girl and was sentenced to serve 50 years’ imprisonment. His brief questions only the sufficiency of the evidence.
It is argued that there is no proof of penetration of the labia, as required by our earlier cases. Gardner v. State, 263 Ark. 739, 569 S.W.2d 74 (1978); Poe v. State, 95 Ark. 172, 129 S.W. 292 (1910). The child’s testimony, which we need not narrate, was sufficient to identify the accused and establish penetration. The examining physician testified that there were signs of irritation, reddening,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Poe v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Holt v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Merritt v. No Fence District No. 2, Jefferson Cty.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. FreemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
3Cited by33 opinions
- Dollar v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Moore v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Ashing v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- United States v. JahagirdarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Stover v. StoverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.