Legal Opinion

Dicks v. Naff

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 22, 1973No. 73-81PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellants attack the constitutionality of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 19-4613 et seq. (Suppl. 1971) (Act 185 of 1965 as amended), which is enabling legislation, and also the constitutionality of an implementing ordinance of the City of Eureka Springs. The city ordinance, as permitted by the enabling act, levied a 1% tax upon the gross receipts or proceeds of motels, hotels and restaurants, owned and operated by appellants, for the purpose of advertising and construcing facilities in the promotion of tourism.

Appellants first contend that the chancellor erred in declaring the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. URREY CERAMIC TILE CO. INC. v. MosleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Holland v. WillisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Bosworth v. PledgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Holt v. City of MaumelleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. City of Mountain Home v. DrakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API