Roy v. Farmers & Merchants Insurance
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
.
David Newbern, Justice.
In this case we interpret, for the first time, a provision in Ark. Code Ann. § 23-89-208 (1987) requiring “reasonable proof of all benefits” be made to an insurance company. The issue stems from a further provision of the Statute that the insurer is liable for sanctions if a claim is not paid within 30 days after receipt of “reasonable proof as to all benefits accrured.” We hold that sending a hospital bill, unaccompanied by any sort of signed application proving that the medical expense entitles the sender to an insurance policy “benefit” is not sufficient to satisfy…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Graham v. Forrest City Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Hinchey v. ThomassonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Hagains v. Government Employees Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Cash v. Arkansas Commission on Pollution Control & EcologySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Holt v. City of MaumelleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Mountain Home School District No. 9 v. T.M.J. Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Pledger v. C.B. Form Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Pugh v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- American Casualty Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Strong v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.