Legal Opinion

Roy v. Farmers & Merchants Insurance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 11, 1991No. 91-170PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.

David Newbern, Justice.

In this case we interpret, for the first time, a provision in Ark. Code Ann. § 23-89-208 (1987) requiring “reasonable proof of all benefits” be made to an insurance company. The issue stems from a further provision of the Statute that the insurer is liable for sanctions if a claim is not paid within 30 days after receipt of “reasonable proof as to all benefits accrured.” We hold that sending a hospital bill, unaccompanied by any sort of signed application proving that the medical expense entitles the sender to an insurance policy “benefit” is not sufficient to satisfy…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Graham v. Forrest City Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Hinchey v. ThomassonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Hagains v. Government Employees Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. Cash v. Arkansas Commission on Pollution Control & EcologySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Holt v. City of MaumelleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Mountain Home School District No. 9 v. T.M.J. Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Pledger v. C.B. Form Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Pugh v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. American Casualty Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Strong v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API