Legal Opinion

Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1981No. 80-1653PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The scope of this court’s review of commission orders is set forth in R. C. 4903.13, which states in pertinent part:

“A final order made by the public utilities commission shall be reversed, vacated, or modified by the supreme court on appeal, if, upon consideration of the record, such court is of the opinion that such order was unlawful or unreasonable.”

Therefore, an opinion by the commission will not be reversed or modified by this court absent a showing of misapprehension, mistake or willful disregard of duty. Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1981), 67 Ohio St. 2d 153, at page 156,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Columbus Southern Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Ohio Water Service Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API