Legal Opinion
Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1981No. 80-1653PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
The scope of this court’s review of commission orders is set forth in R. C. 4903.13, which states in pertinent part:
“A final order made by the public utilities commission shall be reversed, vacated, or modified by the supreme court on appeal, if, upon consideration of the record, such court is of the opinion that such order was unlawful or unreasonable.”
Therefore, an opinion by the commission will not be reversed or modified by this court absent a showing of misapprehension, mistake or willful disregard of duty. Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1981), 67 Ohio St. 2d 153, at page 156,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Columbus Southern Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Ohio Water Service Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.