Legal Opinion

In Re the Regents of the University of California

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 14, 1996No. Miscellaneous 471PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

The Regents of the University of California (“UC”) petition for a writ of mandamus to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, to vacate the court’s July 2, 1996 order 1 granting Genen-tech, Inc.’s motion to compel the deposition testimony of three attorneys employed by Eli Lilly and Company.

Judicial orders may be overturned by extraordinary writ only when there has been a clear abuse of discretion or usurpation of judicial authority in the grant or denial of the order. In re The Regents of the University of California, 964 F.2d…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. In Re Spalding Sports Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. In Re Seagate Technology, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. BDO Seidman, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. In Re Echostar Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. In Re: Gregory LottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API