Legal Opinion
State v. Pyle
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1969No. 69-205PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The question presented is whether the holding of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, is applicable in misdemeanor cases.
In Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, at page 444, Chief Justice Warren, speaking for the majority, summarized the holding, as follows:
“Our holding will be spelled out with some specificity in the pages which follow but briefly stated it is this: the prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to secure the privilege against…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. WigglesworthOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by26 opinions
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. MacUkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Commonwealth v. BrennanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- State v. BolanOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. NealSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.