State v. Perry
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, J.
The first question which this court must determine is: Does the exclusionary rule announced in Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 U. S. 436, require the court to exclude the testimony of the police officer, who apprehended the appellant, concerning the inculpatory statements appellant made to that officer at the scene of the crime, for the reason that such statements were made prior to the giving of any warnings and for the reason that no counsel was present?
It is the opinion of this court that, in the instant case, the exclusionary rule announced in Miranda does not require the exclusion of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Commonwealth v. LopinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. YountSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- State v. WigglesworthOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- The PEOPLE v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. ConleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.