Legal Opinion

Edwin L. Cox v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1978No. 77-3493PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:

Petitioners seek review of an order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). 1 The principal issue is whether substantial evidence supports the agency finding that petitioners delivered uncertifi-cated gas in interstate commerce. Also at issue are whether FERC has authority to order a payback in kind of dedicated gas that was diverted from the interstate market and whether FERC abused its discretion in determining to reopen an earlier certification proceeding rather than to initiate a new certification proceeding. We conclude that substantial evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. California v. Southland Royalty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Mesa Petroleum Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, United Gas Pipe Line Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Mobil Exploration and Producing North America, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  3. Borden, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Falcon Petroleum v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API