Stevens v. Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The first six exceptions are addressed to the admission of evidence tending to show the nature and extent of the plaintiff’s injuries. These injuries are described in the complaint, not for the purpose of stating a cause of action, but of showing both the reasonableness of the contract relied on and the circumstances under which it was made. The plaintiff alleges that he filed no claim for damages because be was assured by the company, tbrougb whose negligence be bad been injured, tbat in consideration of bis waiver be should have employment as long as be lived, and the evidence excepted to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. DolanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Fisher v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Carter White Lead Co. v. KinlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- McMullan v. Dickinson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Rhyne Ex Rel. Rhyne v. RhyneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Littell v. Evening Star Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Proctor v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Fisher v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Malever v. Kay Jewelry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Jones v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.