Legal Opinion
Young v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public Transportation
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided October 23, 1985No. 0564PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cureton, Judge:
Appellant Ed Young appeals from an order of the circuit court affirming the decision of the South Carolina Department of Highways and Public Transportation which denied him permits for four outdoor signs located on his property in Florence County along 1-95. We affirm.
Young is a co-owner of a Days Inn, a Sheraton Motel and the Swamp Fox Inn. In August 1981 he erected four billboards at a cost of $80,000. These outdoor signs advertise the motels and are located on Young’s farm which is located in an unzoned area. In addition to normal farming operations, Young operates two small…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Faile v. South Carolina Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Heyward v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Blocher Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Minnesota Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Hunter & Walden Co. v. South Carolina State Licensing Board for ContractorsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- U.S. Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Eldridge v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- South Carolina Insurance Reserve Fund v. East Richland County Public Service DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- Eldridge v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Eldridge v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.