Legal Opinion

Bleeg v. Metro

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 24, 2009No. CV07050101 A137601 (Control) CV06080473 A137602 CV06110417 A137603 CV06120406 A137604PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant Metro, a metropolitan service district, appeals corrected general judgments that awarded plaintiffs just compensation pursuant to ORS 197.352 (2005) (commonly known as Measure 37). On appeal, Metro raises three assignments of error concerning (1) the trial court’s entry of its corrected general judgments nunc pro tunc to December 5, 2007—the day before Measure 49 became effective—to avoid the effect of the measure; (2) the trial court’s conclusion that ORS 197.352 did not authorize Metro’s “methods for determining whether its regulations reduced the fair market values of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Cyrus v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTESCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Olson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. English Ex Rel. Sellers v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State Ex Rel. English v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Biggerstaff v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Bruner v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. CHARLES WIPER, INC. v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Curry v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API