CHARLES WIPER, INC. v. City of Eugene
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
Charles Wiper Inc. (Wiper), the relator in this mandamus case, petitioned the circuit court for a writ ordering the City of Eugene to process its Measure 37 claim. See former ORS 197.352 (2005) (Measure 37), amended by Oregon Laws 2007, chapter 424, section 4, renumbered as ORS 195.305 (2007) (Measure 49). The circuit court allowed the writ, issued a general judgment to that effect, and eventually awarded Wiper its attorney fees by way of a supplemental judgment. The city appeals both judgments, arguing that, by the time the court entered them, the action was moot as a result of the passage…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kay v. David Douglas School District No. 40Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- First Commerce of America, Inc. v. Nimbus Center AssociatesOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Cyrus v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTESCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Kay v. David Douglas School District No. 40Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nordbye v. BRCP/GM EllingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Bruner v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Birchall v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Bruner v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. v. MichelottiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021