Legal Opinion

Olson v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 14, 2008No. 06C10222; A133922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Plaintiff 1 filed a claim under Ballot Measure 37 (2004), ORS 197.352 (2005), with the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). DLCD denied the claim on the ground that plaintiff is not an “owner” entitled to relief under Measure 37. The trial court reversed after a trial on stipulated facts, and DLCD appealed. In the meantime, the voters enacted Ballot Measure 49 (2007), ORS 195.300 to 195.336, which substantially — and retroactively — amends Measure 37 and applies to pending Measure 37 claims. The state filed a “Notice of Potential Mootness,” pursuant to ORAP 8.45, on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Frank v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bleeg v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. Bruner v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. CHARLES WIPER, INC. v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Cascade Kelly Holdings, LLC v. Oregon Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Bruner v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API