Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Landis v. Tailwind Sports Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2010-0976PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge
Before the Court is Defendant Lance Armstrong’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents in response to his First Set of Requests for Production of Documents to Plaintiff United States [ECF No. 190]. Upon consideration of the motion, the oppositions and reply, and the supplemental briefs and responses, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part. The Court’s reasoning follows.
I. Background
In June 2010, Relator Floyd Landis filed this qui tam action against Lance Armstrong, his former teammate on the United…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Goldberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- United States v. All Assets Held At Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- United States of America, ex rel. v. Sightpath Medical, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.