Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. Holmes

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1952No. 5509PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE CONCINI, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decree of the superior court denying appellants’ injunction to restrain appellees from operating an establishment which dispenses alcoholic beverages, contrary to a restrictive covenant.

Appellants, Charles M. Whitaker et al., hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, and the defendant Bertha Mae Gardner, one of the appellees herein, by divers deeds of conveyance became seized of certain lands situated in Glendale, Arizona. The plaintiffs are the owners of Lots 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block 3, Park Place Addition. The defendant Gardner is the owner of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rowland v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Continental Oil Co. v. FennemoreArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Heisler v. MarceauSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  4. Ainsworth v. ElderArizona Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Murphey v. GrayArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Powell v. WashburnArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Duffy v. Sunburst Farms East Mutual Water & Agricultural Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Carter v. ConroyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. College Book Centers, Inc. v. Carefree Foothills Homeowners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API