Legal Opinion

Heisler v. Marceau

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 13, 1928PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case involves the construction of alleged restrictive covenants contained in a deed under which defendants (appellants) acquired title to and hold certain described lots located in Suburb Royal, a subdivision of the City of Tampa. Conceiving a building proposed by defendants to be erected upon lots owned by them in the subdivision to be of a character forbidden by such covenants, complainants (appellees), who were owners of adjacent lots, holding under deeds containing like covenants, filed their bill, seeking to enjoin the erection and use of such building as a sanitarium. No question…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. Holmes v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  3. Mayes v. HaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1921

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rowe v. MayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Sinclair Refining Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Barrett v. LeiherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Walker v. DorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Whitaker v. HolmesArizona Supreme Court · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API