A.J. Goulder Electric v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Judge.
In the course of consolidated Industrial Commission hearings on a new injury claim and petition to reopen a closed earlier claim, Claimant and the new injury carrier reached a settlement, which the reopening carrier declined to join. At the request of the settling parties, but over the objection of the reopening carrier, the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) approved the settlement and dismissed both the Claimant’s protest of termination of the new injury claim and his protest of denial of reopening of the prior injury claim. Although denial of reopening would thereby…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pearce Development v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- O'Donnell v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Pearce Development v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Sun Control Tile Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kaibab Industries v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Holsum Bakery v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- AJ Goulder Elec. v. INDUS. COM'NCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Lay v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999