Legal Opinion
Stengel v. East Side Beverage
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 28, 2004No. A04-392PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
In a denial of summary judgment, the district court rejected appellant East Side Beverage’s contention that the Workers’ Compensation Act provides respondent Nicole Stengel’s sole remedy against her former employer for injuries resulting from sexually motivated assault and battery by coworkers and a supervisor. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant East Side Beverage is a beer distributor to liquor stores and bars in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Appellant employed respondent Nicole Stengel as a graphic designer of advertising signs for about two years. Respondent was responsible…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Melina v. ChaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Cummings v. KoehnenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Hanson v. Robitshek-Schneider Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Johnson v. Ramsey CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Radcliffe v. Securian Financial Group, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Fu v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Gieseke ex rel. Diversified Water Diversion, Inc. v. IDCA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Mehl v. Portaco, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- David L. Henson as Trustee for the Estate of Maxwell David Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, and Third Party v. Jason Alan Sunby, Third PartyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015